Transition Life Forms: There Are None!
Example: Archaeoptyerx
From Wikipedia H Raab CC BY SA 3.0 online 6-24-18. Berlin Specimen.
Did Archaeopteryx Evolve Flight and Then Get Grounded?
by Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell on November 21, 2013
Dr Mitchell quotes Dr Michael Habib: “And with its feathers and bones looking so much like modern flightless island birds, it just makes me wonder.' Habib found the idea somewhat surprising and in his blog notes that he still isn’t fully convinced. ‘I pitched the idea that Archaeopteryx might have been secondarily flightless, instead of incipiently flighted,’ he writes. 'It's not something I'm convinced of, but I do think it should [be] considered in our range of hypotheses.” (https://plus.google.com/+MichaelHabib/posts)
Dr Mitchell further discusses “Of course, plenty of modern birds are flightless. So why would a flightless Archaeopteryx be surprising or controversial? And why does Habib propose that it was secondarily flightless? Why not just flightless from the beginning?” She goes on to explain that the flightless property in birds is explained by evolutionists as devolution, but how can this be if archaeopteryx is an ancient bird. She goes on to further discuss no fossil evidence for evolution of dinosaurs into birds.
She concludes with, “God created many kinds of birds on the 5th day of Creation week, just 6,000 years ago, all fully fitted out with feathers and the abilities and anatomy that suited the habitats and lifestyles for which He designed them. That some were designed to be flightless is not a problem.”
https://answersingenesis.org/extinct-animals/did-archaeopteryx-evolve-flight-and-then-get-grounded/
See Link below
by Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell on November 21, 2013
Dr Mitchell quotes Dr Michael Habib: “And with its feathers and bones looking so much like modern flightless island birds, it just makes me wonder.' Habib found the idea somewhat surprising and in his blog notes that he still isn’t fully convinced. ‘I pitched the idea that Archaeopteryx might have been secondarily flightless, instead of incipiently flighted,’ he writes. 'It's not something I'm convinced of, but I do think it should [be] considered in our range of hypotheses.” (https://plus.google.com/+MichaelHabib/posts)
Dr Mitchell further discusses “Of course, plenty of modern birds are flightless. So why would a flightless Archaeopteryx be surprising or controversial? And why does Habib propose that it was secondarily flightless? Why not just flightless from the beginning?” She goes on to explain that the flightless property in birds is explained by evolutionists as devolution, but how can this be if archaeopteryx is an ancient bird. She goes on to further discuss no fossil evidence for evolution of dinosaurs into birds.
She concludes with, “God created many kinds of birds on the 5th day of Creation week, just 6,000 years ago, all fully fitted out with feathers and the abilities and anatomy that suited the habitats and lifestyles for which He designed them. That some were designed to be flightless is not a problem.”
https://answersingenesis.org/extinct-animals/did-archaeopteryx-evolve-flight-and-then-get-grounded/
See Link below