Secular geologists describe the Sandia Mountains and related mountains (Manzano and others) as having been formed by "rifting". They suppose that this occurred millions of years ago. However, they are mystified by a supposed gap of time, 1 billion years, between the limestone layers covering the top and the granite that lies conformably below these top layers. These top layers have aquatic fossils. The mountain is 10,678 ft. Secular geologists acknowledge that the tops of the mountain were once covered by a local or regional sea as flat areas before the uplift by rifting occurred.
Yet, another view can be taken: low lying hills were scoured during the early phases of the Noah Flood and then basement rock began to be sequentially covered with sediments containing aquatic life, botanical and biological, and which were rapidly fossilized. The rifting and breaking apart of one land mass into continents would have occurred later in the flood (and post flood). Massive erosion would have occurred in the final stages of the flood and it's subsidence. The supposed time periods between layers would have been vastly shortened-as radiometric dating has significant problems and un-observed assumptions must be made.
There have been numerous talented scientists who generally support the above scenario: Dr Henry Morris (hydrologist) and John Whitcomb (theologian) The Genesis Flood; Dr John Morris (geologist) The Global Flood; Dr Andrew Snelling(geologist)Earth's Catas-trophic Past; Drs L.Vardiman, A. Snelling, E.Chaffin, R.Humphries, J. Baumgardner and D.DeYoung (astrophysics, geologist, physicist, physicist, geophysicist, physicist) Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth.
See links below to purchase the books.
Yet, another view can be taken: low lying hills were scoured during the early phases of the Noah Flood and then basement rock began to be sequentially covered with sediments containing aquatic life, botanical and biological, and which were rapidly fossilized. The rifting and breaking apart of one land mass into continents would have occurred later in the flood (and post flood). Massive erosion would have occurred in the final stages of the flood and it's subsidence. The supposed time periods between layers would have been vastly shortened-as radiometric dating has significant problems and un-observed assumptions must be made.
There have been numerous talented scientists who generally support the above scenario: Dr Henry Morris (hydrologist) and John Whitcomb (theologian) The Genesis Flood; Dr John Morris (geologist) The Global Flood; Dr Andrew Snelling(geologist)Earth's Catas-trophic Past; Drs L.Vardiman, A. Snelling, E.Chaffin, R.Humphries, J. Baumgardner and D.DeYoung (astrophysics, geologist, physicist, physicist, geophysicist, physicist) Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth.
See links below to purchase the books.
I have also written a summary book on Noah's Flood. See link and picture below.
RSS Feed